Author |
Messages |
|
Imported Postdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4734/c47340cd265298b6360c913d5768870c383587ce" alt="User is Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c852/6c852a88054f1b41ace43d347c01caa8f85dc52a" alt="King" King Posts:232
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/480d3/480d3c01edae01c648f275e454a7ff6faa4b0199" alt="" |
16 Mar 2007 3:34 AM |
|
When I take austrailia I just wait. Taking about 1 territory a turn, I stockpile troops in siberia[to get to europe and to mask my intentions],Japan[to get to kamchatka and to mask my intentions]and siam[to protect austrailia] I stay out of wars[to become wealthy]and if anyone gets out of hand I will attack and keep the game in control. When the world is weakened by war, I attack kamchatka from japan, then to alaska. I attack Ural from Siberia, then the Ukrane from Ural. I then sweep up from siam and take the middle east. 3 borders to defend and getting 15 men a turn with europe and north america's power shattered. The key to this plan is patience and the knowledge to know when to strike.
I just like that idea. I think it's pretty cool.
Funk Master Dunk |
|
|
|
|
Imported Postdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4734/c47340cd265298b6360c913d5768870c383587ce" alt="User is Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c852/6c852a88054f1b41ace43d347c01caa8f85dc52a" alt="King" King Posts:232
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/480d3/480d3c01edae01c648f275e454a7ff6faa4b0199" alt="" |
16 Mar 2007 3:34 AM |
|
that is good but first you must get japan and siberia, i would take china and india, putting the bulk of your forces in china to get to mongolia, siberia, and japan thus putting your plan to action
unsunghero10 |
|
|
|
|
cyray7data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4734/c47340cd265298b6360c913d5768870c383587ce" alt="User is Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76420/764204991ab0fc4870614e7666f0f0f434daae43" alt="Diplomat" Diplomat Posts:121
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/480d3/480d3c01edae01c648f275e454a7ff6faa4b0199" alt="" |
03 Jun 2007 8:49 PM |
|
why don't you just put all of your troops in Siam? It would take just as many troops to use your strategy, and you wouldn't have to go out on a limb to get the territories that you want. Not to mention your Australian defenses would be stronger. Also, if you are in a position to take down two continents such as North America and Europe, why not just take Asia? It would connect your empire better and you would have less borders? Just a few ideas, but your strategy does sound very cool! |
|
|
|
|
Bismark08data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4734/c47340cd265298b6360c913d5768870c383587ce" alt="User is Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d209/3d209616394ef1b1c25341d305b78c8a339c7ba6" alt="Strategist" Strategist Posts:14
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/480d3/480d3c01edae01c648f275e454a7ff6faa4b0199" alt="" |
18 Feb 2008 10:41 PM |
|
Great Plan I myself used a simialr strategy recently. I had Australia and Siam, India, China, Mongolia, and Afgan. In one turn I tool North Asia and Alsaka. While also moving against west Asia and Ukraine. Then take Middle East. It worked beautifully for a while but eventually Europe, Africa, and N.A. ganged up on be and CRUSHED me. Well what are you gonna do? For some reason Nailing two continents, and getting 15 men a turn pisses some people off. Who knew |
|
|
|
|
|